For employers, the findings raise an uncomfortable question: does a public commitment to inclusion translate into support when employees need it?
The survey of 1,002 Jewish employees found 87% agreed their organisation expressed a clear commitment to tackling racism and discrimination.
However, 75.5% said its Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) approach was inconsistent in responding to antisemitism.
Meanwhile, 70.8% had avoided raising antisemitism concerns because of uncertainty about the reception they would receive. Just 15.9% said they felt able to raise such concerns.
These findings suggest that visible equality initiatives do not necessarily give every employee confidence that their experiences will be understood.
Interviews conducted as part of the research identified responses including denying discrimination, explaining away behaviour, treating incidents as misunderstandings and acknowledging prejudice without taking meaningful action.
Particularly concerning, the consultancy says, was that some dismissive responses came from DEI functions themselves.
Professor Binna Kandola OBE, Pearn Kandola’s co-founder and senior partner, told That's Business: “No employee should have to repeatedly prove that their experience matters before it is taken seriously.”
The research follows the consultancy’s earlier work examining antisemitism and Islamophobia at work. It also follows its Antisemitism at Work Week webinars in May 2026, during which Jewish attendees described difficulties obtaining responsive support from DEI teams.
For business leaders, the practical message is clear: reporting procedures need to be backed by knowledgeable people who can listen carefully, recognise prejudice and respond appropriately.
Pearn Kandola recommends six areas for improvement: independently reviewing DEI practice; developing specific expertise in antisemitism; distinguishing representation from inclusion; clarifying Employee Resource Groups’ responsibilities; strengthening organisational listening; and encouraging DEI teams to examine their own assumptions.
The consultancy also warns against assuming that perceptions of Jewish wealth, influence or success remove vulnerability to discrimination.
Crucially, Pearn Kandola presents its findings as an opportunity to strengthen DEI. Any function responsible for challenging bias must also be willing to recognise shortcomings in its own understanding.
For employers of every size, inclusion must mean more than policies, statements or awareness campaigns. Employees need confidence that raising a concern will lead to a fair hearing and an appropriate response.
The full report, “Yes but…”: Antisemitism and the Limits of Workplace Inclusion, is available from Pearn Kandola’s website, https://pearnkandola.com

